Question 1 (2 points)
In Minnesota vs Dickerson, the U.S. Supreme Court adopted the plain touch doctrine, allowing officers to seize what, using the sense of touch during a lawful patdown without a warrant?Question 1 options:Probable causeEvidenceFruit of the poisonous treeWritSave
Question 2 (2 points)
Many Supreme Court cases recognize that the basic purpose of the Fourth Amendment is to safeguard the privacy and what of United States citizens?Question 2 options:MoneySecurityEvidenceWitness
Save
Question 3 (2 points)
The Fourth Amendment measures what as the ultimate measure of the constitutionality of a government search?Question 3 options:ReasonablenessEvidenceUnreasonablenessObjectiveSave
Question 4 (2 points)
The Fourth Amendments states that “the right of the people to be secure” in their what?Question 4 options:CarGarageWorkplacePersons, houses, papers, and effectsSave
Question 5 (2 points)
The plain view doctrine applies only to sightings by the police based on what type of circumstances?Question 5 options:IllegalLegalSearch and seizureWarrantless searchSave
Question 6 (2 points)
Authority to enter and/or search an open field with a warrant is supported by what case?Question 6 options:Hester v. USIllinois v. KrullTerry v. OhioThornon v. U.S.Save
Question 7 (2 points)
In Chimel v. California, a search incident to lawful arrest does not require issuance of a warrant based on what measure?Question 7 options:ProtectiveReasonableWarrantPoisonous treeSave
Question 8 (2 points)
No warrant is required to seize what in plain view?Question 8 options:Poisonous treeEvidenceWritProbable causeSave
Question 9 (2 points)
In Illinois v. Rodriguez, if a person gives what, no warrant is required for a search or seizure.Question 9 options:Poisonous treePermissionWritProbable causeSave
Question 10 (2 points)
In what case, can police stop a suspect as long as there is a reasonable suspicion of a criminal act?Question 10 options:Terry v. OhioMiranda v. ArizonaGideon v. WainwrightIllinois v. Rodriguez
